Contribution to the world
by admin on Dec.03, 2009, under Uncategorized
So I was thinking about the contribution we make to this world, statistically / mathematically and this is what I was getting at.
Your Contribution to this world = ( The contribution of your product or service to this world ) / The number of people working on that product or service.
So now the question is , how do we figure out the contribution a product to this world. For my calculations, this is what I will assume.
(From here on, we will assume for practical purposes a service as equivalent to a product )
Independent Contribution of a product (Cp) = Amount of people the product is used by / ( No of users of product 1 + No of users of product 2 +… and so on ..)
Seems like a very tiny quantity doesnt it?
Well, but we for sure feel that certain products enable other products.. For example, electricity.. If electricity was not there a lot of current day luxuries would be missing isnt it? Even if we assume that around 5 Billion people make use of electricity in the world ( and also assuming that the population of the world is 6 Billion ) , electricities contribution to this world seems smaller.. But what if we add the numbers of all the products which are derived from electricity? For example, internet, bulbs, Google? Now adding all these to the contribution of electricity..
ω ( Electricity) = Cp ( Electricity) + Σ (ω(Product affected by Electricity) );
Under this new equation, you might already have observed that, if you are working on a product in a large company, the chance of the product making a contribution to this world goes up slightly but your contribution to this world goes down proportional to the number of people who are employed by your company. So the bigger your company, the smaller will be your contribution ( even for the product that is true right? ) . While, if you are working alone on a product , the chances of the product making a significant contribution to this world goes down but since you are the only contributor to it, the denominator is 1 ( or if you are in a group of 2-3 people , then use the appropriate number ).
Now go ahead, figure out your contribution
Well, enough ranting huh!
Parallel
by admin on Nov.18, 2009, under Tech
So I was thinking about paralllel processing… You know.. Just the kind of thing that I do while riding. Was wondering where and how the processing power will be increased in the future so that the semiconductor industry can adhere to “Moore’s Law“. Seemingly, over time, it is going to get more and more difficult for them to reduce the size of the processor. So i’m guessing they would start increasing the size. Confused?
Well, let me explain. I believe we have already seen the first generation of parallel processors. The current quad core, dual core are the first examples of it. But, lets say tomorrow, we get a 16 core processor ( I am assessing its already there? ). So now, are programs making use of this? Since most of the computer programs that are currently running are built for single processor systems, ofcourse they wont be making use of this feature.
But since we already know that tomorrows processors are going to be multi-processors, shouldn’t the programming languages anticipate that and provide constructs so that if ever such proccessors come up in the future, the programs should be able to make use of them?
We humans, have a dream. Atleast we programmers , I assume, do . Why cant we make the current computer as “smart” as the brain. So can we achieve the levels of a human brains ( or atleast a rats? ) with a huge multiprocessing system?
But then, writing a system that can work in a multiprocessing environment is not a trivial task. The mental acumen required to do that is not trivial either. But the traits of humans is that we are not born geniuses. We learn. So if even one person in the world deciphers an easy way to do it, the rest of us will follow through. But then again, who will bell the cat , huh!!
Vicky Christina Barcelona
by admin on Oct.25, 2009, under Uncategorized
I am a great fan of “thinking out of the box” and I saw a particular concept in this particular movie that seemed like totally out of the box.
I have heard that for us humans, the idea of exclusivity in partners is something that comes genetically. We dont like to share our partners with anyone ? Do we? Ofcourse there are a few individuals who are ok with the idea, but broadly, no one wishes to. We also see a lot of “fall-apart”s because of this. Also because there is this small tiny ingredient that will be missing in most relationships that make it incomplete and this chasm grows wider and wider over the years. Either the individuals involved in this relationship adapt to this “incompleteness” and adjust to it or go separate ways when the chasm becomes so wide that they wont be able to jump to the other side.
Now, in this movie too we see two characters having pretty much the same problem. We always perceive a relationship as constituting two people because that is how it has been through ages. But in this particular case, the three of them made it complete, though when the people increase the higher is the chance of any feud, it still was pretty cool and pretty calm while it lasted. Atleast that is what teh guy said at the end of that relationship. You would see, during the course of the movie, Maria Elena ( Penelope Cruz) telling Christina ( Scarlett Johannson), who is the current lover of Maria Elena’s ex-husband that she was the missing ingredient in their relationship. ??? You might wonder how she got that kind of thought. But that their relationship was not going on rocky waters when Christina was around is what she noticed instead of conspiring to get her ex-husband completely to herself. Amazing thought there and quite unique if you ask me.
I have seen that this kind of movies do not end with any particular conclusion. I noticed that the movie ended rather abruptly and I was swearing when it did, because it was such a nice presentation of thoughts and why they could not give a particular solution for the problem the characters were facing in the movie. But when I was lying on my bed thinking, I noticed that writer had left the movie as life leaves us. In the sense, there are no obvious or proper solutions for most of the human problems. For each solution, there are only choices and there are no absolute solutions.
So, finally there we are with yet another random musing from me, which doesnt lead to anything, which doesnt give you any solutions towards either life or technology. But if it has given you anything to think about, if it has lead you even one step ahead in your quest of understanding the intricacies of life, I would be glad. The movie did lead me further, so I thought of dedicating a blog entry for it. All the best.
Drafts
by admin on Oct.25, 2009, under Uncategorized
I see that writing technical stuff takes a bit of forethought and structure more than writing random stuff like this. Its hard to get a proper flow of thoughts in those segments. Another issue being that, when you have the words flowing in your mind, you never have your laptop in front of you to write it down and click “post”.
So a more unstructured version of those same things ( and I hope my readers don’t mind it
) seems like a better option to me or atleast to my style of writing.
I have a few topics that I have started but have not been able to complete because of my inability to complete them in such a way that it is perfectly structured. So .. they still remain as just that.. “drafts”.
Hope I will be able to complete these things and post them here.
Topics Im planning to write about ( or rather complete ) :
Google Wave.
Flex and PhP Sessions.
Lets hope I get the inspiration to finish them off.
Email using gmail smtp in PHP
by admin on Aug.14, 2009, under Uncategorized
Sending an email from your backend php script is ( as explained in most of the blogs) not a trivial task.
I followed the tutorial in this blog post and everything worked fine for me.
Important things to note are :
1) That the port has to be 465. ( There is another thread going on about 587 or so, which did not work for me) .
2) That the url has to be “ssl://smtp.gmail.com” ( if your mail is hosted under gmail ).
I am a total noob when it comes to linux , network and stuff like that. So , I had a slight bit of doubt if there was something different when they were asking for the “SMTP username” and “SMTP password”. But no, its plain and simple. Its your email id, like in youremailid@gmail.com and its password.
So feel free to use the gmail smtp servers.
The Beginning
by admin on Aug.08, 2009, under Entrepreneur
The greatest distance any entrepreneur covers is the distance between an idea to its implementation. That is where we all fail, isnt it?
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=052b157f-388f-4660-9de9-b13f9db1da79)